REC
00:00:00 · CAM 01 · FEDERAL SURVEILLANCE
702

Fourth Amendment Under Attack

Your Government Is Watching Without a Warrant.

FISA Section 702 allows the FBI to search millions of Americans' private communications — no warrant, no probable cause, no court approval. A federal judge just ruled it unconstitutional. Now it's time for Congress to act.

Contact Your Representatives Learn the Facts
0
Americans Potentially Affected
0
FBI Backdoor Searches (2021)
500
Warrants Required by Law
1978
Section 702 Expiration Year
Classified Program

What Is FISA Section 702?

Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act was passed to allow surveillance of foreign targets on foreign soil for national security purposes. On its face, that sounds reasonable.

The problem is what the government does next. After collecting those communications, the FBI runs "backdoor searches" — querying that database using the names, phone numbers, and email addresses of ordinary Americans — without ever getting a warrant.

You don't have to be a suspect. You don't have to have done anything wrong. If you've ever emailed, texted, or spoken with anyone abroad, your communications may be sitting in that database right now, searchable by the FBI on a whim.

This is not hypothetical. In United States v. Hasbajrami, the FBI conducted warrantless backdoor searches and then concealed those searches from the defense during trial. A federal judge called it exactly what it is: unconstitutional.

"The Government suggests that simply because their queries pertained to foreign intelligence, the Fourth Amendment is satisfied. This Court disagrees."
— Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall, E.D.N.Y., December 2024

How It Works

The Backdoor Search Pipeline

01

Foreign Target Surveillance

NSA collects foreign communications under Section 702

02

Mass Database Storage

All communications stored — including Americans'

03

Backdoor Search

FBI queries database using your name, email, phone

04

Used Against You

Evidence used in prosecution — without your knowledge

Step 1 of 4
Foreign Target Surveillance
The NSA collects communications of foreign individuals abroad under Section 702 authority — ostensibly for counterterrorism and national security. At this stage the collection is technically legal and targeted at non-US persons outside the country.

The Reality of Section 702

BREAKING: Federal court rules Section 702 backdoor searches unconstitutional — December 2024

Breaking Development

A Federal Court Just Said:

"Enough." — Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall, E.D.N.Y., Dec. 2024
"The Fourth Amendment is not satisfied simply because the queries pertained to foreign intelligence." — Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall, E.D.N.Y., Dec. 2024
"The Government cannot use the foreign intelligence label as a magic wand to make the Fourth Amendment disappear." — Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall, E.D.N.Y., Dec. 2024

Section 702 Expires In

--
Days
:
--
Hours
:
--
Minutes
:
--
Seconds

In December 2024, Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall of the Eastern District of New York ruled that warrantless FBI backdoor searches of Section 702 databases violate the Fourth Amendment. It was a landmark decision — and the government is fighting it.

Section 702 is set to expire in 2026. Congress must decide whether to reauthorize it — and under what conditions. This is the window. This is the moment.

Help Us Keep the Pressure On

A History of Abuse

The Evidence Against Section 702

← Drag to scroll →

Origins
Section 702 Enacted
Congress passes the FISA Amendments Act, creating Section 702 as a tool for targeting foreign nationals abroad. Americans are promised their data will be protected.
Leak
Snowden Revelations
Edward Snowden reveals the NSA's mass surveillance programs, showing Section 702 sweeps up millions of Americans' communications alongside foreign targets.
Abuse
FBI Searches Protesters
The FBI uses Section 702 backdoor searches to query communications of Black Lives Matter protesters — American citizens exercising First Amendment rights.
Violation
Improper Searches Logged
The FISA Court finds the FBI conducted over 278,000 improper backdoor searches of Americans' data, including searches targeting journalists and political donors.
Concealment
Hasbajrami Case
It's revealed the FBI ran warrantless backdoor searches in the Hasbajrami case and then hid this fact from the defense during trial — a fundamental due process violation.
Ruling
Court: Unconstitutional
Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall rules that FBI backdoor searches of Section 702 databases violate the Fourth Amendment. The government immediately appeals.
Now
Congress Must Decide
Section 702 expires April 2026. Congress faces a choice: reauthorize warrantless surveillance of Americans, or finally require a warrant. Your voice matters now.

By The Numbers

The Scope of the Problem

FBI Violations
278K+
Improper FBI backdoor searches found by the FISA Court in a single review period
Notifications Sent
0
Americans who received notice their private communications were searched
Empty Reforms
56
Reforms Congress claimed to add in 2024 — none required a warrant for American data
Vote Margin
1
Vote margin by which the warrant amendment failed in the House — 212 to 212

Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Not directly — but that's the problem. It targets foreigners abroad, and in doing so sweeps up every American who communicates with those targets. The FBI then searches that data on Americans with no warrant required.
Yes — 56 of them, according to leaders like Speaker Johnson. But not one required the FBI to get a warrant before searching Americans' communications. The core constitutional problem was left completely untouched.
In December 2024, Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall ruled that FBI backdoor searches of Section 702 databases violate the Fourth Amendment. The government is appealing, but the ruling stands as a landmark finding that the program is unconstitutional as currently operated.
The NSA would lose authority to run new collection under Section 702. Existing surveillance could continue temporarily, but new targets couldn't be added. This gives Congress maximum leverage to demand real reforms before any renewal.
The warrant amendment failed 212–212. One vote. Congressional offices track constituent contact volume and it directly influences votes. A 60-second phone call from you counts more than you think.

Spread the Word

Help Us Reach More Americans

Most Americans have never heard of Section 702. Share this site and let's change that.

Take Action

Three Ways to Make a Difference Today

Reform won't happen on its own. Congress responds to constituent pressure. Here's how you can directly influence the outcome of Section 702 reauthorization.

01

Call Your Representative

A 60-second phone call carries more weight than thousands of emails. Tell your House member you oppose warrantless backdoor searches and demand a warrant requirement before Section 702 is reauthorized.

Find Your Rep
02

Write to Your Senators

The Senate must vote on any FISA reauthorization. Contact both of your senators directly and demand they include meaningful warrant protections for Americans before any renewal passes.

Find Your Senators
03

Spread the Word

Most Americans have never heard of Section 702. Share this page on social media, talk to friends and family, and help us build the grassroots pressure that forces Washington to act.

Share This Page

Know Your Opposition

Who Is Blocking Reform?

These are the congressional voices pushing hardest for a "clean" reauthorization of Section 702 — no warrant requirement, no new protections for Americans. They want this program renewed exactly as-is.

U.S. Senate
Sen. Mark Warner
Democrat — Virginia · Chair, Senate Intelligence Committee
"This authority is absolutely indispensable to keeping Americans safe... letting it expire would be devastating to our national security."
Led the Senate push for a clean reauthorization in 2024. Has consistently blocked warrant requirement amendments, arguing they would "handcuff" intelligence agencies.
Opposes Warrant Requirement
U.S. Senate
Sen. Chuck Schumer
Democrat — New York · Senate Minority Leader
"In the nick of time, bipartisanship has prevailed. Letting FISA expire would have been dangerous."
Orchestrated the 2024 reauthorization that stripped all privacy amendments before final passage. Declared victory as Americans' warrant protections were voted down 42–50.
Stripped Privacy Amendments
U.S. House
Rep. Mike Johnson
Republican — Louisiana · Speaker of the House
"The plan is to move a clean extension of FISA… it is responsible for intelligence that we use to protect and keep Americans safe."
As Speaker, Johnson is spearheading the push for an 18-month clean reauthorization with zero new warrant protections. Personally briefed House members alongside FBI Director Kash Patel to whip votes for the no-reform extension.
Leading Clean Extension Push

Sources: Congressional voting records, floor statements, and news coverage of the 2024 RISAA reauthorization debate. The 2026 reauthorization fight is ongoing — these members' positions may evolve under constituent pressure.

Find Your Representatives

Look Up Your Congress Members

Enter your ZIP code below to find your U.S. House Representative and both U.S. Senators, with direct links to their contact pages.

What to Say

Phone & Email Script

Fill in your details on the right and the script updates live. Then copy and go.

"Hello, my name is [Your Full Name] and I am a constituent calling from [Your City], [Your State], ZIP code [Your ZIP]."

"I am calling to urge [Representative's Name] to oppose any reauthorization of FISA Section 702 that does not include a strong warrant requirement for FBI backdoor searches of Americans' communications."

"In December 2024, a federal court ruled these warrantless searches unconstitutional, finding the FBI violated the Fourth Amendment. Congress should not reauthorize a program a federal judge declared unconstitutional. I am asking him to stand up for Americans' privacy rights and demand a warrant requirement before any vote on Section 702 reauthorization."

"Section 702 expires in April 2026. This is the moment to fix it. Please do not allow a clean extension that leaves Americans' Fourth Amendment rights unprotected."

"Thank you for your time. Can I get a confirmation that this message will be passed along to [Representative's Name]?"

Your Details

Legal Disclaimer

EndFISA.com is an independent public awareness and civic engagement project operated by a private individual. This site is not affiliated with any political party, political action committee (PAC), candidate committee, nonprofit organization, or government entity. No funds are solicited or accepted through this website.

Sources & Accuracy

Quotes and voting records attributed to public officials are drawn from publicly available government records, congressional floor statements, and credible news reporting. All opinions expressed are those of the site operator. This site does not engage in express advocacy for or against any candidate for public office.

First Amendment

The information and opinions expressed on this website constitute protected political speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Content on this site is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

© 2026 EndFISA.com — All Rights Reserved. Political speech protected under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.